![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Bismarck Class Battleship |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Briefing
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overview |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Bismarck class were originally conceived as 35,000 ton battleships, to fit within the Washington (1922) and London (1930) treaty limits. It was found early in the design process that the specified requirements for speed, armour and main armament could not be met within this displacement, and as the preliminary design work progressed the displacement crept up to its final figure of 41,700 tons (standard). There was considerable debate over the choice of main armament. Initially eight 330 mm (13 in) guns were specified, however this was increased to 350 mm (13.8 in) guns in early 1935. Eight 380 mm (15 in) guns were considered in March 1935, and although this was initially rejected on weight grounds (the ship would not be able to use the largest lock at Wilhelmshaven due to its draft) 380 mm guns were eventually selected in May. These guns were designed for action in the North Sea, where the engagement range was likely to be low due to the typical visibility conditions, and were intended to be able to penetrate the belt armour of ships built within the treaty limits at short range. Following normal practice in Germany, a secondary and tertiary armament was selected. The secondary armament was intended for use against surface targets, and comprised twelve 150 mm (5.9 in) guns in six twin turrets (three port and three starboard). The tertiary armament was intended for air targets, and comprised sixteen 105 mm (4.1 in) guns in eight twin mounts (four on each side). This arrangement had the advantage that surface and air targets could be engaged simultaneously, however the latest designs from France and Britain provided dual-purpose secondary armament and no tertiary armament, reducing weight and allowing more guns to be available if air and surface threats were met separately. Close range defence against aircraft was provided by eight twin 37 mm (1.5 in) cannon (8 x 2) and 12 single 20 mm (0.8 in) machineguns, and was comparable with contemporary warships. The armour gave the ship a theoretical immunity zone of 11,000 to 21,000 m (12,000 to 23,000 yds) for the machinery spaces against a 16 in (406 mm) gun, meaning that at ranges below 11,000 m a 16 in shell could be expected to penetrate the side armour, and above 21,000 m a 16 in shell could be expected to penetrate the deck armour. The deck armour was actually split on to two decks, and the upper deck armour immunity zone was a maximum of 11,000 m. The magazines had a maximum immunity zone of 25,000 m (27,300 yds), and although the minimum range is unknown it was certainly very short. It must be stressed that this is a theoretical calculation, as in practice several factors (particularly the sea state) affect the actual resistance to shells at the instant they hit, and the immunity zone is constantly changing as the ship heaves, rolls and pitches. The Bismarck was designed for a maximum (trials) speed of 30 kts, and was powered by geared steam turbines, fed by 12 boilers. Their speed was thus slightly slower than the modern French battleships, but quicker than the latest British designs. Hangar space was provided for four Arado Ar-196 floatplanes, the standard aircraft for German capital ships at this time. The Bismarck class of ships were fundamentally sound designs that never lived up to their potential. As with all ships of that time her air defence capability was poor, however this was increased in the Tirpitz as the war progressed. Their propulsion arrangement, with triple screws, made the ship slightly directionally unstable and meant that the rudder had to be worked more than in contemporary ships, particularly in a following sea, affecting speed and fuel consumption. Nevertheless, these were relatively minor defects, and the ships showed themselves capable of absorbing considerable damage, as well as having effective main armament. Whilst the Bismarck was lost on her first sortie, and the Tirpitz never engaged enemy warships, these ships had a profound influence on the naval war. In particular the Tirpitz, simply by her presence close to the Arctic convoy routes, forced the British to devote considerable resources to ensuring her containment. The fear that she might be in a position to strike led to the destruction of convoy PQ17, and it was her value as part of a 'fleet in being' that restricted her operational use. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Units |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 1: Emergency full load (or 'war full load') displacement and draft was greater than this | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Ships
French Ships
German Ships
Italian Ships
Japanese Ships
USA Ships
Other Ships
Documents
|